It started for me with their mini’s and ended with their attack on internet Blood Bowl.

Buy Reaper! lol

ie

Geeky as it sounds a friend of mine once summed it up as,
“We’re fighting under the right flag but Horus is giving the orders now”
In other words, a hell of a hobby, job, company ruined by tards.

I think what most people feel when Muslims get angry over ANY depiction of Muhammad is the hipocracy Muslims show over it. Their religion forbids the depiction of ANY religious figures not just Muhammad.

So why don’t they get angry, protest and deliver death threats when Buddha, Jesus, Moses or any other religious figure is represented in either a good or bad way?

It’s blatant hipocracy on their part. Not meaning to offend the followers of Islam, but their God means nothing to me, which is exactly the same stance they have on other religions, as evidenced by the posters and shouts of “death to the infidel” you constantly see.

It’s “give and take” but they don’t seem to want to be on the giving side.

We are all Infidels and should be killed as far as they are concerned.

I did not in any way state or imply that Islam – or any religion at all – should be above criticism. And I am absolutely not saying that violent extremists should be ignored or worse, encouraged. I fervently believe the exact opposite of those things!

What I am saying is that there is a difference between criticising a religion and deliberately setting out to be offensive to somebody’s religious beliefs.

What I am saying is that Draw Muhammad Day is pure trolling and adds nothing to any sort of constructive dialogue about the place of radicalism in Islam. Doing something that you know other people will find offensive, just so that you can feel smug when they do get offended, is fucking retarded!

This isn’t about cultural clashes or whose country is closest to the flashpoint, this is about people’s unwillingness to engage in a respectful and educated dialogue, and their absolute willingness to believe that somehow Muslims as a whole are “violent” because they get angry when people deliberately offend them.

I can also once again only reiterate, that political satire of a single politician is not the same thing as deliberately setting out to offend millions of people. I am very confused as to how you can draw a connection there!

I think it’s all very well being righteous when you’re far removed from such cultural clashes, but experiencing it here in the UK is much different. Take this story for example;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/6972109/Wootton-Bassett-protest-group-Islam4UK-to-be-banned.html

Now I’m not saying the Muslim community as a whole should be held responsible, but in the same way we chastise parents for naughty children’s behaviour, there should be increased pressure on religious leaders to ensure that such extremist behaviour is not bred within their walls.

Regardless, as a Brit talking to an Australian, I’m suprised you support any notion that our history of brutal, scathing satire and provocation is not anything but a badge of honour. I for one do not want to live in a world where we have to be tiptoe around and watch our words in case we offend anyone. Especially when it comes to religion – it’s been at the heart of pretty much every major conflict since time began.

Or are you just trying to troll me too? Ho ho ho

Also, yes everyone has the right to be a dick. Accordingly, if you choose to exercise that right, it becomes very apparent that you are a dick. Good post.